Use cases

Catch regulator complaints, chargebacks and bonus abuse in casino support

Flags conversations that name a regulator or dispute service, threaten legal action or a chargeback, abuse staff, or show shared accounts, third-party payments or bonus abuse, so the right team looks.

Try it on this example

Example · An angry email about a withdrawal declined for verification

Channel (email, web chat, chat app, SMS, call): Email

The whole conversation, oldest message first

From: Mehmet Arslan Subject: Withdrawal declined You declined my 1,500 EUR withdrawal because the card is in my wife's name. She lets me use it, so what is the problem? I play on my brother's account too and he never had this issue. If this is not paid in 3 days I will report you to the Malta Gaming Authority and ask my bank to reverse every deposit I made.
  1. Does the customer mention a gambling regulator, a dispute resolution service or an ombudsman?Yes99%
  2. Does the customer threaten legal action or mention a lawyer?No85%
  3. Does the customer threaten or report a chargeback or payment dispute with their bank?Yes97%
  4. Does the customer direct abuse at staff?No68%
  5. Is there a sign that someone other than the account holder uses the account?Yes92%
  6. Is there a sign the customer pays with a card, bank account or wallet in someone else's name?Yes98%
  7. Is there a sign of bonus abuse, such as several accounts or claiming an offer more than once?No64%
  8. Does the customer make a formal request about their personal data?No96%

These are real answers stored from one run on this example.

The prism behind it

Catch regulator complaints, chargebacks and bonus abuse in casino support8 questions

Fields

  • Channel (email, web chat, chat app, SMS, call)
  • The whole conversation, oldest message first

Context

We are Kestrel Play, an online casino and sportsbook. The text is one support conversation, oldest message first, and may have no speaker labels; the customer is the person who contacted support. A flag sends the conversation to a person in compliance, fraud or legal, who decides what to do. No answer here restricts an account or accuses a customer.

Questions

  1. Does the customer mention a gambling regulator, a dispute resolution service or an ombudsman? Yes / No

    Yes: The customer names or threatens to contact a regulator such as a gambling commission or authority, an alternative dispute resolution service, or an ombudsman, or says they already have. No: No such body is mentioned.

  2. Does the customer threaten legal action or mention a lawyer? Yes / No

    Yes: The customer threatens to sue or take legal action, or says a lawyer or solicitor is involved. No: No such threat appears. A complaint to a regulator or a dispute with a bank is not legal action; other questions record those.

  3. Does the customer threaten or report a chargeback or payment dispute with their bank? Yes / No

    Yes: The customer says they will dispute, or have disputed, a deposit with their bank or card issuer. No: No such dispute is mentioned.

  4. Does the customer direct abuse at staff? Yes / No

    Yes: The customer insults, threatens or harasses an agent or staff member. No: No abuse at a person appears; strong criticism of the service is not abuse.

  5. Is there a sign that someone other than the account holder uses the account? Yes / No

    Yes: The conversation says or implies another person plays on, logs into or controls the account. No: There is no such sign.

  6. Is there a sign the customer pays with a card, bank account or wallet in someone else's name? Yes / No

    Yes: The customer says or implies a payment method belongs to another person, such as a partner's card or a friend's wallet. No: There is no such sign.

  7. Is there a sign of bonus abuse, such as several accounts or claiming an offer more than once? Yes / No

    Yes: The conversation mentions several accounts for one person or household, using other people's details to claim offers, or arranging bets to take bonuses without risk. No: There is no such sign. Asking about bonus terms is not a sign, and playing on someone else's account counts here only when it is used to claim offers.

  8. Does the customer make a formal request about their personal data? Yes / No

    Yes: The customer asks for a copy of their data, its deletion or correction, or cites data protection law. No: No such request appears.

Lens columns

regulator_or_adr, regulator_or_adr_probability, legal_threat, legal_threat_probability, chargeback, chargeback_probability, abuse_of_staff, abuse_of_staff_probability, account_sharing, account_sharing_probability, third_party_payment, third_party_payment_probability, bonus_abuse_signs, bonus_abuse_signs_probability, data_rights_request, data_rights_request_probability

Run it on your own text

Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.

Ask for an invite